Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I can understand not awarding a tech-win if both players are at fault, for example, if they couldn't agree on something. But this is a different situation. It is explicitly stated that a player does not receive 1 point for voluntarily forfeiting a match. No one should care how the match was played – whether someone forfeits on the first turn, the second turn, or decides not to generate a map and just enters a report in the header, or any other way... It's the same as if Kasparov, in a chess match, needed to avoid losing the final game, and because he's afraid of losing, he says, "I forfeit," and the judge records both scores as zero, which is what Kasparov wanted.
Here's how three friends can prevent two world champions from advancing from the group stage under any circumstances.