Forum

Valera, say that to his opponent, who breaks the rules, then loses, and then annoys everyone with his agreements, which probably didn't even exist. You need to know how to lose, that's what matters.
And you're just nitpicking. The guy won fairly, and now he's forced to justify himself to you for something I don't even understand.

I want to clarify - I wasn't attacking anyone; I just said that agreements need to be kept, and there's no need to write things like "without Armageddon, it's just child's play." That's what I was talking about. Whether there was any agreement in this specific case is unknown to me, and frankly, I'm not interested. So, if I'm attacking anyone, it's Kash :D.