There aren't any athletes in the modern world who excel in both hockey and soccer. I would compare this to tennis on different surfaces. There are tennis players who are favorites on clay but become easy targets on grass (many Spaniards and Argentinians). And there are very strong players who are good on all surfaces (Nadal, Federer, Djokovic).
The same applies to Heroes (an analogy to tennis). Some are very specialized – SOD smurfs (for example, Van), but within their specialization, they are strong players. And some are versatile and play very well in all versions (Alex, Stinger, Cobra, Le Bron). The former have two paths: continue in their specialization or become versatile and expand their capabilities.
Rafael Nadal was already the king of clay a few years ago (zero losses at Roland Garros for 3 years), but on grass, he was mediocre. Many told him that it wasn't his thing and that he shouldn't bother.
But he mastered the grass courts of Wimbledon, first reaching the final and then winning the tournament.
So, for us, changes in rules and versions are just changes in the surface. Naturally, for some, it's a major issue (SOD/Smurf players), but for others, it isn't (versatile players like Alex, Stinger, Cobra).
That's exactly what I'm saying.
Whatever happens, everyone should vote, and they will know that grass will be used, no matter what, and not the clay they prefer.
To do this, you just need to be able to read and be able to visit the topic where the rules will be decided.
...and did they offer Nadal a table tennis racket? ))
rules in tennis - rules in Heroes
the surface on the court - templates in Heroes
the type of racket - the version of the game
if I misunderstood you, correct me, but the example is a bit off regarding the difference between surfaces and the difference between versions. ))
and Captain, you need to be more polite and think about what you write about other Heroes players; everyone who made it through the qualifiers deserves to be in the final and deserves respect!!!
