Nomination "For contribution to the development of the heroes movement 2009"

Guys, no offense intended. I just don't know how the votes will be counted when there's the possibility of choosing multiple candidates. Ideally, just being on this list should already indicate respect from the community and recognition by the community. I think this is a pretty significant award – Nagan hardly has any competitors here. But he did act strangely in the CIS championship; I personally didn't understand it. Plus, he himself asked not to nominate him. Hence my vote for Pete! Only Nagan can probably compete with him in terms of the scale of projects: creating the Tournament Committee, revising the rules, creating an algorithm for identifying cheaters, and much more! I'm voting for you, Pete!