2010

I'm just curious, on average, how many games did Forrest analyze for these leaders? Or are the rankings based on success and reputation? I'm asking only because I'd like to understand how Forrest prioritizes, no offense intended!

There's a suggestion that it's not so much the games themselves that are analyzed, but rather the attitude towards tournaments. Like, who is more likely to win, and who is less likely. Plus, a small adjustment is made based on skill.