Sacred Haven of Debauchery

By the way, Siva's idea is quite plausible, he just drew the analogy too deeply. We can simply assume that no matter how much a person splits atoms, nucleons, and subsequently quarks, and something else, they will never encounter a truly indivisible particle; instead, as progress is made, they will find ever smaller particles that make up larger ones. Similarly, we will never find the limit of the size of our world. That is, we know celestial objects, such as planets, stars, asteroids, and so on, then there are galaxies, clusters of galaxies, and our Universe... And then "clusters of universes," "clusters of clusters of universes," and so on, to infinity. But this is already philosophy, although it sounds interesting :)

As for Wolf, I would at least use my brain a little. I think everyone knows that the phenomenon of the horizon is a direct consequence of the Earth being round; one can deduce this with only spatial imagination, even without special knowledge. This is just in case Wolf doesn't believe in photographs of the Earth from space