Round table

Auto-translated

Alex_R

to AlexSpl
It's hard to find a real-life example here... People don't perceive the resistance skill or the properties of artifacts/creatures as such; rather, they believe that the activation of resistance in a defending hero should have a positive effect on the attacking hero (if the magic doesn't work, then I'll run away so I don't get beaten up)... This, in my opinion, is utter nonsense.
That's why there's a rule against cheating... You made your move, be honest and wait for a response, don't run away from the battlefield like a jackal. And the fact that your move didn't hit your opponent means you're just a lousy player.

Let me give you a real-life example. Person A noticed that his neighbor B regularly leaves his apartment door unlocked, so he decided to rob him. But there was a second door, which prevented him from entering the apartment and caused zero damage to his neighbor B :D. According to your logic, A should be tried for burglary :D

Added 3 minutes later

Alex_R

or rather, he believes that the activation of resistance in a defending hero should have a positive effect on the attacking hero (if the magic doesn't work, then I'll run away so I don't get beaten up)... This, in my opinion, is utter nonsense.

Again, this is incorrect logic; the activation of resistance still benefits the defender more, or am I wrong?

Всем удачи ! И Морали !

Reading content in

Interface language

Round table