Mafia: general discussions.

Regarding that rule about making correct statements about one's role, bluffing, and so on. I looked through the previous Mafia game and decided to show what I consider to be acceptable and what isn't.

By the way, it's strange that no one went to Cash...

This was already a hint, a very subtle one, but it spoke volumes. I don't know about others, but it became clear to me that this phrase wasn't accidental :) I liked it.

By the way... What if the GM doesn't name the blocked killers? (If you can answer this question, then SNOW-GIRL! answer...) That is, if someone else was going to kill Kyle/Arandor, but was intercepted, then they simply reported that someone was lurking in the distance, so as not to reveal the person... Could this be the case? Then all our guesses will be shattered by the lack of information=)

Added after 53 seconds
This explains the absence of an obvious move from the Investigator and the Snow Maiden.

The next post made everything clear: Wedma is the Investigator. It's not difficult to put the two posts together to get the name of her victim. However, this is only obvious to me. The hints are still subtle and within the rules. Although it's already close to the limit... But I like this kind of game; it's dangerous :)

I continued to search through the posts about my execution, but I didn't find anything compromising. There are some vague hints, but everything is within the rules. I apologize to Wedma for complaining back then.

P.S. It's easier to kill me; it will be difficult to hang me, I warn you)

This is an obvious bluff. Of course, I wasn't going to skip my turns. And I was "peacefully" sleeping, probably because I was trying to kill Wedma. Well, I was peacefully sitting in ambush at my home :) (aside)

Wesker is not a confectioner.

If I argue, then according to the current rules, I will be modkilled =) Because I cannot reveal other people's and my own roles. Those who need to will understand.

And this is clearly too much. It's written in plain text: I, the Investigator, checked Wesker - he's bad. And a fair modkill was issued for that.

What I'm getting at. :) I don't know how you will formulate the rules, but there should be opportunities for both subtle role reveals and bluffing. But it shouldn't be possible to reveal a role in the way it was done in the last example