Вегтам
Auto-translated
• It is forbidden to directly reveal your role or the role of another player (if you know the role of another player, you should not shout it out everywhere... You need to be smarter, more cunning...). This action will result in immediate disqualification.
The general idea of the rule, in different Mafia games, looked different.
8. It is forbidden to reveal your own/another player's role, or its elements, as well as information obtained about them, in public places or among players who are not in the same group as you. The same applies to information about other players. Phrases like "well, I also know something about him that I can't say" are a violation, regardless of whether you actually know something or are lying.
Statements like: "I checked," "according to my information, which I cannot disclose," "I know for sure" - etc. are prohibited. Unsubstantiated shouts like "he is MAFIA!", "I am a Town member!" etc. are allowed.
To avoid violations of this rule, try to express your thoughts as assumptions or as IMHO based, for example, on clues or behavior.
It is allowed to refer to the rules, the GM, your own posts, or the posts of other players, as well as to any external sources where you found some information about the clues.
This version, which I copied from "Crossroads of Worlds" (that's where Mafia came from - note), is better formulated IMHO.
• Discussing the game outside of this topic (i.e., in private messages, ICQ, etc.) is only allowed if you have a role that permits it. In this game, this is only possible for the Mafia.
The most interesting rule is that it is very important, but it is constantly violated (I confess, I violated it once in #11, and although I was not the one who initiated the conversation, my guilt is still present). It is impossible to control this. All that remains is to hope for the honesty of the players. The only possible way to combat this is to include it in the lists.
• A player who does not vote after 12 hours of the game day is considered to have voted against himself.
A rule that even the GM forgets about. The question is, is it necessary?
1. The GM is always right.
2. If the GM is not right, see rule 1.
Also from "Crossroads." It must be added.
Also: Rules regarding executions. I think it is better to choose a single option.
Questions:
If a player has received the required number of votes, should they be given the opportunity to cancel them before the end of the day?
Or should the day end immediately after the required number of votes is reached?
If the majority voted for NNV (No Night Vote), should the day end?
I would suggest giving the opportunity to cancel votes and, in no case, reduce the duration of the day.
The remaining rules are mostly clearly formulated. You can also put the rules up for discussion - both existing and possible ones.
Наше оружие - неожиданность! Неожиданность и страх, страх и неожиданность - это два наших оружия! Плюс безжалостность - три наших оружия: страх, неожиданность и безжалостность! И ещё фанатичная преданность Папе - четвёртое! Наше оружие включает в себя... наше оружие включает в себя... страх, неожиданность... я сейчас!