This is ridiculous, dear editors. So, the evidence against Gura and Hermit is insignificant, but if there's evidence against Siver, it must be true?
I'm sorry, I'm just very upset. Why does even the most insignificant barbarian look more credible than more obvious evidence that it's not him?
And where is the evidence against Hermit? I don't remember any... Can you provide links?:o
Лидер клана "Из многих единое"
Приключения – это сплошные неприятности, только про них почему-то потом интересно вспоминать...