Samurai
Auto-translated
The expert plays often, sometimes even in random matches. I don't think it's necessary to talk about his reputation as a strong player – everyone knows... Kral (correct pronunciation: "Polite Moose") is one of the best players overall, versatile in both random and fixed matches, and he also plays frequently... DA is also a strong player; he just qualified for RP-4... But these three aren't enough; we need to get DVSStranger and Yamu involved, and a couple more people wouldn't hurt.
We'd happily play fixed matches with them (I think that should be their rules).
The question is, can Nagan (and there's no one else) lure them all into participating?
Added 8 minutes later
By the way, there are quite active Tournaments on three resources, which are called the strongest Tournaments of the resource – in my opinion, it would be logical to take players from there for such Competitive events. Otherwise, what's the point of holding these "BEST" Competitive events? It immediately becomes clear what the main Tournament of the resource is worth.;) No offense.
I would also like to suggest a 2-2-2 scheme... that is, a total of 6 people represent each resource in each match against another site (they can change in the next match)... 2 people play only according to the rules of the opponent, 2 people are versatile, and 2 people play only according to the rules of their own resource. This will allow both smaller resources to field a team and the best players to play according to their own rules.
We'd happily play fixed matches with them (I think that should be their rules).
The question is, can Nagan (and there's no one else) lure them all into participating?
Added 8 minutes later
By the way, there are quite active Tournaments on three resources, which are called the strongest Tournaments of the resource – in my opinion, it would be logical to take players from there for such Competitive events. Otherwise, what's the point of holding these "BEST" Competitive events? It immediately becomes clear what the main Tournament of the resource is worth.;) No offense.
I would also like to suggest a 2-2-2 scheme... that is, a total of 6 people represent each resource in each match against another site (they can change in the next match)... 2 people play only according to the rules of the opponent, 2 people are versatile, and 2 people play only according to the rules of their own resource. This will allow both smaller resources to field a team and the best players to play according to their own rules.