Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I understand that when the tournament organizer is also a participant, the situation is delicate, as there is always a risk of being accused of bias and lobbying for one's own tournament interests. What advice can I give? It's not my area of expertise; there's an arbitration committee for that. Dear Volodymir, I have only one piece of advice (not specifically for this situation, but in general): in a group tournament, you shouldn't prioritize the number of actual games played when the scores are equal, because imagine this: I have 4 wins (actual games), another participant has 3, and there's one game left between us. Is there any point for me to play it? And I wish you the best in reaching an agreement with Andrey; I think it will work out. IMHO.