Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
For beginners and not only! How to download TE-Lite.
As I understand it, you think that TE is a step back in terms of spectacle!? On the contrary, there are games with control, buyouts, and multiple flag battles. In SoD, there are many instances of players giving up/surrendering even before contact (which Vic mentioned above). And in 90% of cases, the flag battle is just one. Maybe it's just a different style on HvH.
Wlk777
I think that TE is more correct and boring than SoD, closer to chess. Battles with neutrals without the risk of losing or taking serious losses are subconsciously uninteresting. That's why TE isn't as popular as SoD; it gets boring quickly, and on the resources where it's played, there's a trend of decreasing player activity.
Two positions have been expressed. For example, I usually go online to play against a person; offline is suitable for wars with neutrals. Out of the already considerable number of games on SoD, I can only recall one with TC on Jebus in the Selection, where there were several final battles, and the opponent at that time called the game the most interesting of the year. In TE, such games happen only once in a while. Although, of course, it's not just about the version, but also about the template that is being played.