Skip to content

Should the starting hero for Necropolis be chosen randomly?

User Avatar
#56
Auto-translated
OUTLAW
I think it's pretty clear here... Shakti, Kirr, etc., shouldn't be put in the same category as Galtran.

And no one is. The point is that after Galtran is banned, Shakti becomes the hero who is a contender for ban #1, and so on...
Since complex issues are being discussed (some factions are played often, others rarely), a comprehensive approach is needed.
Let's assume we adopt option 3. As a result, Necropolis will be played as often as Inferno or Tower after some time. And so what? Is that the goal?
Many people have subjective views on factions. There are factions that someone constantly excludes (not just Necropolis), and therefore the overall picture won't change much from weakening Necropolis.
In any case, each of the options should be tested, and only then should a final decision be made. But, for example, if we test not only SOD with the proposed changes, but also, for example, TE-light for comparison, who among the supporters of options 1 and 3 will agree to this? It's not about Galtran, but about adherence to traditions/habits and the search for solutions that don't go beyond them.