Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Should the starting hero for Necropolis be chosen randomly?
Introducing new players is certainly a good thing.
Please forgive my persistence (and noobishness), but allow me to ask (you, for example, esteemed OUTLAW), what is better: to cut back/limit the factor that creates imbalance through rules, or, without doing any of that, simply tolerate the same Necropolis with Galtran? Because by going down the first path, we only impoverish the game. What's next? Will we ban Shakti, Kirr, Valeska...? Or does conservatism prevent us from embracing the new? Anyway, most games will still be played with 3-4 factions... And with a randomizer, we'll get roughly the same number of games for each faction and a more or less balanced experience. Surely, starting with a Necropolis with Galtran shouldn't cost more than 10,000?
Again, sorry for the off-topic.