HeadHunter
Auto-translated
I'm addressing everyone.
My post contains no accusations, only facts. And I'm asking the Arbitration Committee to evaluate them. I'm not accusing my opponent of anything. If the Arbitration Committee decides that the map can be revealed and then a decision can be made whether to continue playing or surrender, it will be useful for everyone on the forum in the future.
The post about me violating the rules arrived at the same time as my refusal to play the next day (this only concerned the next day), which means the map had already been revealed.
In my opinion, it's impossible to add nomads without diplomacy on this template. And it seems pointless to prove that a wyvern took over the nests (it's a pity there wasn't an angel guardian).
What's the point of having an Arbitration Committee and a thread on the forum if you can't publicly ask its members a question and get an answer? Why do you have to communicate via instant messengers and private messages? Is someone afraid of something? Any decision by the Arbitration Committee will be acceptable to me. I think that the following situation is unpleasant not only for me but also for other players on the forum: you play for 3 hours, your opponent leaves the game without warning, says they will finish it tomorrow, reveals the map, and then decides whether to continue the game or surrender.
And finally, about the "strictly formal" violation of the rules. The rules either exist or they don't. How else can it be?
With sincere respect.
My post contains no accusations, only facts. And I'm asking the Arbitration Committee to evaluate them. I'm not accusing my opponent of anything. If the Arbitration Committee decides that the map can be revealed and then a decision can be made whether to continue playing or surrender, it will be useful for everyone on the forum in the future.
The post about me violating the rules arrived at the same time as my refusal to play the next day (this only concerned the next day), which means the map had already been revealed.
In my opinion, it's impossible to add nomads without diplomacy on this template. And it seems pointless to prove that a wyvern took over the nests (it's a pity there wasn't an angel guardian).
What's the point of having an Arbitration Committee and a thread on the forum if you can't publicly ask its members a question and get an answer? Why do you have to communicate via instant messengers and private messages? Is someone afraid of something? Any decision by the Arbitration Committee will be acceptable to me. I think that the following situation is unpleasant not only for me but also for other players on the forum: you play for 3 hours, your opponent leaves the game without warning, says they will finish it tomorrow, reveals the map, and then decides whether to continue the game or surrender.
And finally, about the "strictly formal" violation of the rules. The rules either exist or they don't. How else can it be?
With sincere respect.