Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

Dear friends, let's get this straight! First, my time for the game runs out, and I leave the map! Then, I ask him if we can finish the game tomorrow – he says no (and I only have time tomorrow, meaning I have time today, but not for the rest of the week), so I decided to concede to him. But first, I decided to check if he was playing fairly. That's why I asked him about the wyverns and the nomads. But my opponent had a quick reaction and immediately posted this here, and specifically the part of the conversation where I admit something, not where I explain why I did it. In the end, I'm not an idiot to just blurt out the truth and say that I cheated.
I admit that, strictly speaking, I did violate the rules: (I started asking him about the wyverns before I wrote "I concede, we won't be able to finish the game"). Although the very fact that I asked about the wyverns already implies that we will not continue the game, and he should have asked why.
But I believe that this report about me, as if I'm a cheater, etc., is unfounded. He just writes, "I'm rushing to inform the forum users," which creates the impression that I cheated someone, tried to use something for personal gain, or hacked the save during the game, but none of that happened. It's not my fault that my opponent doesn't know how to communicate properly.
Well, I'm new, I don't know all the nuances, and next time I will take this factor into account.
Fine the opponent 5000 units.

P.S. And he still added the nomads!:smile24: