Oelm
Auto-translated
One path in Grand Order and other games is simply a statement of fact – the complexity of the situation, not its unwinnability. I would be a complete idiot if I considered this the main reason for losing. Please separate the main points from the secondary ones. As far as I remember, there was one report about a Necropolis player against a Rampart player, where the Necropolis player couldn't handle the situation. There were no chances for him. And that's it.
I remembered an old match of Zenit, when Kerzhakov still played for them. There, the Zenit players were making ridiculous mistakes in the penalty area, couldn't make the final pass, missed open goals, and kicked with their heel instead of controlling the ball. They won 2-1, I think. After the game, the coach (Petrzhela) and the players unanimously said that the reason for the defeat was a penalty that the referee didn't award for a foul on Kerzhakov.
I remembered an old match of Zenit, when Kerzhakov still played for them. There, the Zenit players were making ridiculous mistakes in the penalty area, couldn't make the final pass, missed open goals, and kicked with their heel instead of controlling the ball. They won 2-1, I think. After the game, the coach (Petrzhela) and the players unanimously said that the reason for the defeat was a penalty that the referee didn't award for a foul on Kerzhakov.
Земля нуля.
Все в ней нулево и кукольно.
Все в ней нулево и кукольно.