Auto-translated
Okay, so I was thinking about something. I'm not sure, though. Basically, here's my train of thought:
There's this thing where players who only play in Tournaments are considered strong, but they're not actually at the top of the overall ranking. This means there's no single, consistent way to measure skill. Now, they want to create a unified ranking system. I mean, whatever, what's the big deal? But it seems to me that this will just be another way for players to compare themselves to each other, rather than actually helping the organizers.
What was I talking about?
Oh, right. I remembered tennis. Everyone plays in tournaments; there aren't any casual games. Of course, some people miss tournaments due to family reasons or injuries. So, everyone has an equal chance of making it to the top.
In general, tournaments are divided into categories, and points are awarded based on the tournament's rank. The ranking is calculated based on these results. The ranking includes results from tournaments over the past year. That is, the results of a tournament that took place a year ago are no longer counted. So, it's a truly objective assessment of players' skills.
I thought that if this were implemented in Heroes of Might and Magic, it would be great. But there are some challenges: tournaments should be as quick as possible, and there should be more of them; people should miss as few as possible, and there should be a lot of people participating.
Anyway, I just wanted to share my thoughts. Those who watch tennis will understand. If you don't like it, you can downvote me and use profanity