Auto-translated
Here's an idea I had. Shouldn't we create a Tournament Player Rating? Find an algorithm that translates tournament successes into numbers and create a table.
1. Why should only a player's tournament experience be considered when determining their skill? Many newcomers don't have any. Besides, it's not a fact that a person will play better in a tournament than, for example, in a seasonal game. I, for example, have the same mindset. Often, the more you prepare, the worse it turns out. For me, tournaments are just games with specific rules, devised by the organizer.
2. How can tournaments be divided by "weight" based on classes? This has nothing to do with skill, and some organizers might be offended when their tournament is considered insignificant.
3. The place taken in a tournament is not an indicator. It may be the result of glitches or depend on the level of opponents with whom one was lucky enough to participate in the group.