I suggest a scenario where the last played match is replayed, determining the top 2 or 3 players with the same scores.

Before the match, there would be a psychological setup where one player needs to win 2 matches, while the other only needs to win one. This also seems unfair.

Another option is to use the minimum time of matches played directly with the contenders for advancing from the group (a kind of analog to goals scored).

We also thought about and discussed this. But again, there is a high degree of randomness, as many people really like to lose on turn 113, for example... Or one player has fast turns, and the other has slow turns... There are too many unnecessary factors. There will be match-fixing. Like the last two players will play. One wins against the other. And the loser says: "Let's just write that the game ended on turn 115 instead of 144" :smile42: