I have enough ammunition and provisions for a war on two fronts.
That's right. I don't like the fact that some freeloaders take other people's ideas and rework them as they see fit, then churn out hundreds of cliché yellow books, games, and even movies in which the heroine invariably wears mithril thongs plus ten. Add elves, a dragon, and an evil sorcerer to the mix – you get the most banal nonsense imaginable, from which someone will still make a certain profit. And there are no doubts about whether he will make it; just look at the bookstore shelf and survey the multitude of books on Warhammer, Stalker, StarCraft, Warcraft, and even Diablo.
Therefore, now there are many minor or significant variations of the original. Someone buys copyrights to something, right? And not everyone will dislike it. That’s why things like “dark elves” appear, depending on the idea, professing matriarchal sadomasochism (of course, with a strip of leather as clothing) or being noble outcast protectors, equally noble orcs who wield magic and save the world and their tribe from cataclysms, and, of course, intelligent dragons-mages, in the terminal stage becoming deities, as can be seen in the latest version of "Heroes."
Of course, dragons were invented by the people, and not by anyone specific, but who, in that case, was not invented by the people? Hobbits?
Of course, I choose facts that support my point of view, which is quite logical; however, I don't reject others, but refute them; nevertheless, remembering other examples that I have commented on before.
And here, by the way, dragons in the East are quite peaceful, wise, and positive creatures. This too is tradition, canon, rule. And also about dragons.
This would mean nothing if it weren't for the fact that this thought has to be brought up again and again, each time discussing it anew, treading water. It already takes up two paragraphs now.
But I would not like to end up on the ban list due to the momentary whim of those who disagree with me in a heated discussion. This wouldn't make a person look good.
If I don't know the person I am communicating with face-to-face, but online, then I avoid familiarity.
However, if you are uncomfortable...
And that doesn’t inspire confidence.
There are people for whom "the more, the better." Whether it's the number of races, weapons, worldviews, no matter how inconsistent or stupid they may be. You even have a corresponding section on the forum, don't you? These people will really appreciate a lot. But with such an approach, they would call everything green-colored just orcs. If someone considers this an elegant and original solution, it won't be me.
Ah, these dwarves. An old and tired problem of translation, in which drunken "dwarves" were easily translated as "gnomes," while small and skinny "gnomes" always lead to perversions?
Then that’s clear. A simple mismatch.
By the way, here are a couple more examples of good dragons.



Akatosh is the dragon god of time, king of gods from the TES universe.

If you don't like the idea of god-dragons, I can provide this cutest creature. If desired, I will throw in several screenshots showing his behavior on the battlefield at times when he is not attacking or sleeping. Then the little dragon eats apples, plays with a snail and "roots" for Amelie's troops.
🏹🎪+⛓️♿=💕