I don't even doubt this. Do you know how many of these "correct" tables I've seen? :) As an option, I posted one of the early ones a long time ago, but I don't remember where exactly I got it from...
Unit ranking in HMM III
But there are no fewer questions, and doubts only increase...:cool:
I immediately noticed that the Centaur Commander is better than the Halberdier! :) And a lot of other things... :)
Okay, it's a flawed table. :)
Although, for comparison and to find other people's mistakes, so as not to make the same ones, it will be useful. :)
Added 6 minutes ago
By the way, I suggest also counting the "Bulkiness" of monsters, but as a negative value.
Approximately: -5%.
:)
Added 3 minutes ago
Ugh....
The table does not correspond to reality.
I wonder if the authors even tested it a little? :)
Added 5 minutes ago
...how many of these "correct" tables I've seen? :)
I suddenly started thinking....
What is the point of all our actions - to create a "Super correct" table?
Or to develop a method, create a scheme for evaluating units?
And does anyone even need it?
Okay, calm down, I'll go home now... It's Friday after all, my brain is already fried after a week :)
Good luck to everyone!