Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
No, you didn't claim that Nagas are inferior in any way, but you did state:
This is more of a problem of good "feeding" rather than the weakness of Nagas.
This is specifically a problem with Nagas, or rather, with their inability to retaliate effectively. Dragons love to attack units with special abilities – Nagas, Vampires, Pit Lords, etc.
In other words, equally strong stacks of Nagas and Knights have different chances of getting the first strike from dragons.
Of course, if you compare a Tower with a Rampart or a Dungeon, it is inferior. But I said that the Tower can compete with a Castle and a Swamp.
The same applies to a Castle and a Swamp. For the Castle, the Marksman + Knights combination is clearly stronger and easier to manage, plus Angels in the long run. And the Swamp has a very balanced growth and excellent heroes. Both of these castles are clearly stronger than the Tower in both Shades of Darkness and The Restoration of Erathia.