Тяжелый случай
Auto-translated
A question has arisen regarding "red rush."
Let's imagine a situation: Red, with 127 units, positions itself in front of the Guardian. On turn 131, with a new growth, it breaks the Guardian (let's assume that without the growth, the Guardian cannot be defeated). Then, it detaches a portion of its units as a scout and, with the remaining troops, occupies the opponent's castle, thereby winning the game. Is this a "red rush"?
And the second situation: Red, with 127 units, positions itself in front of the Guardian. On turn 131, with a new growth, it breaks the Guardian (let's assume that the Guardian kills our units, exactly the amount of the growth). Then, Red occupies the opponent's castle, thereby winning the game. Is this a "red rush"?
Let's imagine a situation: Red, with 127 units, positions itself in front of the Guardian. On turn 131, with a new growth, it breaks the Guardian (let's assume that without the growth, the Guardian cannot be defeated). Then, it detaches a portion of its units as a scout and, with the remaining troops, occupies the opponent's castle, thereby winning the game. Is this a "red rush"?
And the second situation: Red, with 127 units, positions itself in front of the Guardian. On turn 131, with a new growth, it breaks the Guardian (let's assume that the Guardian kills our units, exactly the amount of the growth). Then, Red occupies the opponent's castle, thereby winning the game. Is this a "red rush"?