Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
So, what should we conclude from this math? I, for example, see that Craig, with 9 moves and visiting a couple of attack-boosting structures or structures with the worst attack art, can almost guarantee the elimination of a full stack in the minimum number of moves. Gurney, on the other hand, will almost always have a couple of griffins left, which will take the counterattack and then full stacks will run over them. .
And what will Craig do, for example, against a guard post from the Stronghold faction consisting of a group of harpies or 100 zombies? That's right, he will lose, at best, a small part of his army, and at worst, a large part. Gurney eliminates such blocks easily and without losses with 3 groups of birds, and the saved troops in reserve will be useful ;)