DISCUSSIONS on “Rules for online games in HoMM3 and formulas for calculating player rating.”

Even though I actually enjoy confirming losses (while trying to understand my mistakes), I strangely agree with Samurai's proposal. He explained everything correctly. The only thing is that a minimum limit of confirmed wins should be introduced for new players (5-10 at least) so that there aren't any random reports "made up out of thin air." Otherwise, I don't see what the problem is:confused! If you want, confirm it and show good sportsmanship; if you don't want to, don't confirm it if you have personal reasons. What does "anarchy" have to do with it? I can't understand...
A lyrical digression à la Averne:) :
"Once, Diogenes came to a lecture by a famous philosopher, sat in the back row, took a fish out of his bag, and held it up above his head. First, one listener turned around and looked at the fish, then another, then almost everyone. The enraged philosopher cursed:
- You ruined my lecture!
- But what is the value of your lecture if some miserable fish distracted everyone?";)
So, here, you write about "fighting spirit" and "sportsmanship"? Let's see if they really exist, or if "some miserable fish" – the cancellation of mandatory confirmation – will suddenly make everyone "unsportsmanlike":D ?
And confirmations like "it happened, thanks" are just unpleasant to read, and those who write them might as well not confirm anything at all... IMHO, of course:cool:.

Added after 4 minutes
Ah, and most importantly! I would like to hear the opinion of the respected vbn, our forum martyr (there's no other word for it, given the number of unconfirmed reports), the unconfirmed report hunter! What does he think about this?..