by the way, what if, for those who voted to ban ALL spellcasters in the 4 magic factions, their opponent chooses their starting spellcaster (and, accordingly, the Castle...)? :). It makes sense – if someone is confident that ALL of them are overpowered, let them prove it by taking ANYONE – chosen by their opponent. Clarify, maybe I'm mistaken somewhere?
By the way, initially Britva suggested removing 3 Castles from the Swordsmen, I counted and decided that 2. Here I might be wrong. If you express your opinion on this, I will be grateful.
I meant to play one game as Deemer, and the second as Andru – Swamp, although it is not banned, just for fun, so that they don't think that mages are completely useless.
Moreover, I wrote about the overpoweredness, what it consists of (for example, starting on grass), and not about the fact that you will take Deemer or Aislin at the start. So, in essence, this only proves that it is possible to play with mages in principle. Thus, it is not necessary to start with these 3, as I see it.
I would play as Aislin, Tanta, not so much because of searching for the truth, like who is to blame and what to do?)), but I would play with non-gram mages without the Galthran faction, but there are two problems: playing the latest fan games, I have 10 losses out of 10, i.e. complete degradation - autumn exacerbation or something)), and I don't have that much time, I can play properly once every 10-14 days, if such a statistician is needed, then I am ready to play for the above-mentioned characters.
I would choose Charn as my starting spellcaster for the Necropolis, but here's the thing... ))
I won't say anything about your degradation – you'll get together and you can play normally, I know. But I'll ask everyone again: is one week enough for the tournament? Or should we make it two?