Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
It's a bit different. If, of course, you're talking about the "how would you act" thread.
P.S. what's the point of living if there's no one around?
Isn't that better than not living at all? :)
because there won't be any food either
You can always cook food. You don't just eat ration packs, do you?
and everything else, because there's no one to work
Yes, sooner or later, the power plants will stop working, and there won't be any way to watch DVDs or play games. :smile21:
a person cannot be completely alone in an empty world.
That's debatable. I think a person can find a way to live their worthless life. And there will be enough food and the results of human labor for a very long time - one person doesn't consume very much. Wanted to ride a Lamborghini - here you go. And that's it in that regard.
that's exactly it) it's better to save everyone and die than to survive and then kill yourself.
What's the point of a world without me? (c) Me.
i.e., roughly speaking, the second option + suicide.
But whether to kill yourself or not, the individual will have to decide after making the previous decision.