Auto-translated
Therefore, I ask you not to clutter this thread with the same information, rephrased in different words, and not to escalate this problem.
It's strange that you are asking such questions. But I will have to answer. A complaint was received from your opponent that you are a cheater. He also told you this. And it's strange to hear that you are not aware of this; it's some kind of nonsense.
You misunderstood the situation. The first controversial situation arose when the opponent called me a cheater and left the game. I turned to judge STRANNIK (according to the Rules, see paragraph 1 of this message). And he, as he later told me, resolved this situation by telling me that the opponent would continue to play and everything would be fine. I decided to continue playing as if nothing had happened [...] Thus, the episode (the first controversial situation) is resolved. A few days later, I asked STRANNIK again to confirm that everything was indeed okay and that the opponent was playing. Answer: yes, he is playing.
I understand that the game situation may have been in your favor, but since a controversial situation arose, you should at least try to prove it with facts, rather than making unsubstantiated accusations against everyone.
Now I would like to hear evidence of my "cheating" in addition to the above requirements