If, for some reason, you are not satisfied with the judge's decision, there are other judges. And ultimately, there are the organizers.

Happy New Year. And to whom did I address the letter on the previous page?

The judge's requirements must be followed.
...
As for your guilt, it is at least in the fact that you "made yourself vulnerable" by not following the judge's direct instructions. That's all.

In my opinion, I explained in sufficient detail that the requirements were knowingly impossible to fulfill, especially after I stated that I could not provide several save files. Especially within such a short period of time. And regarding the requirements of the judges, which must be followed, what if a judge demands that you submit a report about a lost game, even if you won it? Will you blindly agree to this, or should you listen to common sense? You can answer "yes," but you will be wrong.... In any case, I would like the judges to at least somehow respond to player complaints. Otherwise, you can build such logic: The judge does not respond to a complaint -> he does not fulfill his direct functions (see point 1 of my previous message). He does not fulfill the functions of a judge -> he is not a judge. He is not a judge -> he has no right to demand anything. So, even if I am guilty of ignoring the judge's request (which I categorically deny), the judge STRANIK is guilty of not responding to my complaint a few days earlier. However, no sanctions are even being considered against him (see point 2 of my previous message). Although, this violation should be considered earlier!

Your claims are expressed quite coherently and beautifully. However, I know the people who have spoken out about this here as quite adequate and intelligent. Therefore, I think they have reasons to make a decision not in your favor.

I'm sorry if this offends you, but it sounds like this: it seems that you are right, but my friends are here, so I'm on their side... In any case, if the judges have any clearer reasons than "ignored an unreasonable request," then I, as a direct participant in the controversial situation, should be informed of them before all possible deadlines pass? I still haven't heard anything about them...

There wouldn't even be formal grounds for removal.

You are indirectly confirming bias against me, because it seems that there is only one formal reason to keep my opponent in the game. In a game that he lost miserably.

This is me, as a judge from the previous World Championship, speaking.

It remains only to regret that you are not a judge in this Championship. Although, I am ready to nominate you as a candidate on par with Zybr and Lee if justice prevails. Don't be alarmed, even I almost don't believe in it :) Not to mention...