Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Solmyr, Demeer, and Aislin are cheaters (and/or) kamikazes; do the rest have a right to exist?
I am FOR unbanning level 4 heroes (Loïnis and others, definitely). I wouldn't mind if Solmyr, Aislinn, and Dimair were also unbanned.
Loïnis correctly pointed out (fewer bans).
But, as in the previous discussion of this topic, I suggest making the starting heroes random for all castles, with a ban on level 4 specialists! There are many advantages:
1) There won't be 1000 reports with the same heroes: Valeska, Gosha, Shakti, Tazar, Kirr, Vistan, etc.
2) You won't have to think about what to do with Shakti – a random start + even if Shakti appears in 1 out of 4 games, it's not necessary that they will create a good army at the start with 3 stacks of 85-95 troglodytes + harpies and maybe cyclops.
3) A more balanced starting army:
Castle, Dungeon, and Necropolis will have a lower starting army strength, bringing them closer to the other castles.
4) New strategies for each castle and slightly different priorities (in my opinion).
...there are a couple more debatable and not entirely obvious advantages, but I don't see any specific disadvantages.
...in Heroes 5 online, people almost always play with a random hero at the start...
P.S. Question....has been raised several times, but it hasn't been addressed yet... :smile42: