Dude, just browse the forums – you’ll find plenty. Of course, many of them are subjective and debatable, but they exist nonetheless.

That’s usually how you do it. You say something confidently and categorically.
And then either “I don’t have time to prove it,” or “it doesn’t count because I was wrong,” or “it’s a subjective concept.”

About my signature, so you can understand it better, or maybe find it funnier. I don’t know what your sense of humor is like.
The first part. I made it when my third child was born.

The second part. I really don’t take or give autographs. Many people who have played with me can confirm this. We only played one game together. I already explained what happened and how.

The fact that someone proved something in one game means (Oelm) that if you prove it many times, it will mean even more.

It was the same with Necromancers. You said they were strong in Tower of Chaos 3. I played and proved it with a 3-0 score. You changed your opinion about Necromancers with the Transformer.
If you don’t acknowledge direct games that contradict your theses, then what should you acknowledge?