Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
The topic has stalled, but the poll clearly shows that **the rules NEED to be changed** (20 against 9, even 8 for obvious reasons...).
Regarding optional restarts, I think the most compromising option for everyone would be: **"a total of 3 days for each player,"** and let each player decide how to use those 3 days: either 3 restarts on day 111, or 111 and 112, or 1 restart on day 113 – this will provide some flexibility in decision-making, which is definitely a good thing:smile20:! By the way, for SOD, where it's critical to have a built-up level 2 structure at the start or 2-3 stacks of specialized units, ballistae, etc., the possibility of 3 restarts on day 111 would be great:smile13:!
Regarding the meeting – this is a more delicate issue, as people are afraid of the "Shahtyora" map. What can you do?:( I like my proposed wording: **"only if the goal is not on the way,"** but we still need to discuss whether to **gradually reduce the time limit**, i.e.,: **after taking 116 by meeting, then only up to 115, then up to 114, etc.** – otherwise, it could drag on indefinitely, and we don't need that:smile48:!
Ибу ибуди - хуйдао муди - Шаг за шагом можно достигнуть цели (китайская мудрость)
Кто к нам с пером придёт, тот от пера и погибнет!:smile51: