Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

The probability of this is minimal. He will most likely try not to be detected. Especially since all the methods of detecting maphacks have been clearly explained to him. With some ingenuity and understanding of the game, it will not be difficult for him to bypass them.

You are quite clear and reasonable.

1. Someone is cheating. (Let's assume)
2. It will not be difficult for him to bypass the methods of detecting maphacks because he has "some ingenuity." (Certainly)
3. All the others are "not cheaters," although any strong player has some ingenuity. (Oops...)

Could it be that any strong player is a cheater a priori until he proves otherwise? ;)

Soon, other processes will begin, because as long as online gaming exists, so do mutual accusations. And no one is protected... The procedure for labeling has been simplified to the extreme. Soon, either many will receive this label, or it will be necessary to admit that the mechanism is ineffective. And the Committee simply will not be able to objectively handle the flow of complaints from the losing side... It's all going wrong. And, most importantly, the goal has not been achieved, because, as you yourselves admit, cheating is impossible to prove! But the mechanism for dealing with those who are disliked has been perfected... It's as if they are doing something wrong...

An irrelevant question – why was the label needed if "everyone already knows everything"? To humiliate a person? Let him defend himself as best he can? If he doesn't, does that mean he admits it? And if (knock on wood) we punish an innocent person and this is later revealed, will we apologize? Yes? Do you even understand that you have no right to make a mistake? Absolutely no right? What you are doing is an execution for an online nickname, not a punishment for a player...

The passions will subside, but what will happen then? And this is not about a specific person, although the entire mechanism is being tested on his example. It is about the prospect of applying this mechanism in the future... And if next time, for another reason, a decision is made to "delay the ultimate measure, not rush to conclusions," how will this be perceived in light of the current situation? Because now the Committee no longer has the right not to punish any guilty (read: suspected) player with the label! It's a bomb, in short. You just don't see it yet. Unfortunately, for all of us.

Post Scriptum

I urge you not to refer to my words, pointing to my "obvious" hidden motives, because I have a link to a clan in my signature, and it is clear whose side I am on, and so on – these tired arguments. All this has been said many times and will not bring anything new. HW will be mired in scandals and disputes not because there will be those guilty of violating the rules, but because there is no procedure that will help the innocent feel protected from arbitrariness. This entire process, which is considered complete, can be repeated at any time against any player who is disliked. What's wrong with that?