Skip to content

Skills in the game

User Avatar
#61
Auto-translated
Gomunguls
I would like to know – what makes it better? Can someone tell me what the point is? But please, don't rely on the opinions of experienced players... like, "this person started playing with her, and everything was great."
I would choose Caitlyn as a starting hero only with the hope that there will be a decent hero in the tavern who will become the main hero, and Caitlyn will just provide money... I don't see any other point... or will someone defeat everyone with wisdom and intelligence?;)
Caitlyn brings in money, and that's why she was chosen as a starting hero 200% of the time. It's simple. But why do people play her now? Well, that's a question for Mirael, as a classic player... I think he probably knows about the existence of Valeska :D. I hope he will respond, and we will all understand the logic.
Gomunguls
And why does the value of leadership and ranged attack decrease???:confused: Morale means a lot in battle; I've had it happen many times that because of the morale of the troops, an additional attack immediately changed the outcome of the battle, and no matter what you say... there are also few situations where it won't matter, so I think ranged attack won't hurt either!:cool:
I'll explain why leadership is bad (at least, that's how I understand it). In the early stages of the game, when deciding whether to attack certain monsters, the player builds a battle tactic based on the units and understands that they should win even without morale dropping. But in the final stages, for example, leadership looks more serious... An extra turn of 50+ wyverns in a free-for-all battle is worth a lot and can sometimes turn the tide of the battle.

P.S.: As for the statistics. It's no secret that Castle is one of the favorite castles for most beginners, hence the stats. The best statistics should be conducted among players of the same level.