Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

Auto-translated

Dirty_Player

The CML should not be imposed for life. Everyone should have the right to a second chance. So a person tried to deceive the people, it didn't work out, he came to his senses and repented. Maybe it would be enough to only impose it for 1 year? And then if the person comes to his senses, reforms, and repents, then why not give a second chance? Even the criminal code usually does not impose life sentences.

We actually already discussed this, and this issue is implicitly resolved in the rule about handling cases of unfair play.

...any HeroesWorld user (not necessarily a game participant) can contact the AC (to any of its members) with suspicions of cheating, if the game/games were played on any other resource in any online HOMM3 tournament between HOMM3 players registered on HeroesWorld.

Here we discussed the statute of limitations for saves. I suggested examining games played within the last year. But the AC members considered that unfair play is not subject to a statute of limitations. Kostya, you yourself spoke about this during the discussion.
And regarding punishment:

the accusations are substantiated, the accused is declared an unfair player, the topic is closed, a detailed summary on this topic is posted on HeroesWorld, and a decision on punishment is made in coordination with the administration. If a player is awarded a Black Mark of Cheater, the AC no longer conducts case reviews for this user. The presence of a Black Mark under the user's avatar blocks his access to all tournaments organized by the TC.

After a year, we remove the CML and immediately receive for review saves from 2 years ago, which we are obligated to consider?

Reading content in

Interface language

Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.