Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.

The judging is simply not yet at the highest level, and there is a lot of confusion, which the judges sometimes do not have the time, desire, or patience to sort out.

For proper judging, rules are needed first and foremost. In any area of human activity, there are many charters, laws, regulations, etc., that govern every detail.
Besides Adelaide's attempts more than a year ago, we practically have nothing in this direction yet. That's why I'm working on the Tournament Rules, to take into account as many controversial situations as possible and to jointly decide what the judge should do. Now, any decision raises questions, as the judge can only be guided by his intuition and his ideas of fairness. And ideas of fairness and decency are different for everyone. Therefore, it is quite natural that there will be dissatisfied people. I hope that in the future, any decision of the judge will immediately be supported by a quote from the Rules.
I do not have the opportunity to devote myself to Heroes around the clock. The Tournament Rules are under discussion; thank you to everyone who is participating in it. We are moving forward little by little; there is not enough time for everything at once.
For the past month, the AC has been working on the Rules for resolving situations of unfair play. This is now one of the most pressing issues. We tried to take everything into account; let's see how it will work.
Also, the AC is currently, based on this Rule, reviewing several games with suspicions of cheating.

Added after 10 hours 28 minutes
I deleted the last posts; the controversial issue turned into a squabble that has nothing to do with the matter.
The AC has made a decision and will not reconsider it.
Calm down, gentlemen. I'm closing the topic for a week.