Pit for LM
Auto-translated
1. Because I won't make a tragedy out of it, I can always find an opponent for a game in HMM3.
2. I've already provided the logs; these were my attempts to arrange tournament matches. Both opponents should make an effort to negotiate. Why weren't there any attempts to negotiate from you and other players?
3. I didn't have time for it; I needed to get ready quickly, and it wouldn't have changed anything anyway.
4. Because there were no attempts to negotiate a game with me.
5. I was counting on an extension of the deadlines and understanding.
6. I have no complaints about specific players; I was outraged by the overall situation where only 6 out of 15 games were played, and only 5 were actually played (one had an internet connection issue), the tech choices were made based on an unclear principle, and I was made out to be the one at fault.
I'm tired of these arguments, and I'm not going to continue them. If this tournament is over, so be it; it seemed more formal than anything else to me. Although it was the most appealing of the current tournaments because I enjoy playing on fixed maps, and I have repeatedly made suggestions to play on them, which those I made the suggestions to can confirm. Long live the administration. You can close this topic.
I hope that this will be the end of it.
For myself, I have drawn a serious conclusion about the need to quickly finalize the Tournament Rules and ensure the correctness of all formulations. We will have to explain the meaning of the word "negotiate" in the Rules and clearly outline the algorithm for this action. Over the past month and a half, I have spent hours analyzing ICQ logs and arguments – who, when, what, and to whom proposed. If we want tournament deadlines to be met and games to be played, we need to learn about communication culture and mutual understanding.