Heroes 6 - Discussion

They simply couldn't have failed to release the 5th installment – Ubisoft was probably haunted by the success of the 3rd game. Perhaps they were facing a crisis of ideas or something else... But everyone wants money. As a result, things like the movie "The Return of the Musketeers" or the game "Heroes 5" came to be, and the general idea behind them is, in fact, the same – to make money off a brand created by other people. From the outside, it looks exactly like that, and it doesn't inspire respect.

Of course, they couldn't have failed to release it; it's logical to continue the series, in my opinion. Especially such a series.
Perhaps Canningham was haunted by the success of the first game, and he released the second... and then, horror of horrors, the third, which also "doesn't differ much" and "made money off the brand." True, it was "created" by himself.
The logic is simply impeccable :smile49:

Do you think that the 5th game should have been released with the graphics of 1997?
:smile20:
That's exactly what should have been done! Then no one here would be writing about the 6th part because there would be no need to wait for it due to the failure of the 5th.
In 2005, using a long-outdated graphical component would only be done by a complete idiot or someone who doesn't have money, but Ubisoft and Nival do. We're just jealous, aren't we? And that's how a game with "unnecessary and completely superfluous 3D graphics" turned out, although the convenience of all the "unnecessary" innovations is obvious.
What are you picking on the cover for? For 2005, it's not that bad.

Someone else's idea? Like Heroes? Well, that's what Heroes is, the 5th part, here's such a revelation.
There's no more difference between it and the 3rd game than there is between the 3rd and the 2nd, and between the 2nd and the 1st, and so on. %)