Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I really don't understand this logic: "winning by letting your opponent resign isn't a real win," but winning by letting the AI defeat you is okay? To me, it seems logical to say that it's the opposite. I understand that people often play for fun rather than for ranking, but you shouldn't confuse the two. It's one thing to have a fun battle against a combined army that your opponent split up to harass or clear a resource point and then got caught off guard (which shouldn't count, of course), and it's completely different to win because your opponent underestimated neutral creatures (and then that "noble player" posts the victory and somehow climbs in the ranking:confused:). In that case, it's probably not my problem that the opponent attacked the wrong thing and lost. At worst, if my conscience kicks in and the situation is truly hopeless for the other player, I can finish the game without it counting or start a new one, but I won't post this one (it has happened before, and IMO, that's the right thing to do). I think I've said everything.
Ибу ибуди - хуйдао муди - Шаг за шагом можно достигнуть цели (китайская мудрость)
Кто к нам с пером придёт, тот от пера и погибнет!:smile51: