Tournament Committee - general questions.

Letter from Pit for LM

- No new suggestions yet.
- Regarding tags - I agree to give them to those who haven't received them yet.
- Regarding current nominations:
*Organizer of the Year* - yes
*Player of the Year* - yes
*Rookie of the Year* - yes
*Clan of the Year* and *Offline* - not within our competence, although we can revisit this later.
*Unconfirmed Reports* - I agree that such people should be noted, but perhaps not with a "black mark" - but rather a "list of undisciplined players" can be placed next to the tournament table or add a column to the rating table (for notes).

Although, to be honest, these aren't exactly big names:D If they didn't meet the requirements, then they didn't pass the test to become masters (Just kidding).:)

No, this isn't a joke - it's a valid point. There's a concept of "form" - when there are few games, it's not necessary to list them as rookies, but also not to include them in the TOP.

We can look at their statistics for previous seasons, where they probably played more games.

Well, for example, I have a maximum of about 15 games per season, and on average from 3 to 10 games, and it's unlikely that I'll ever play more than that