Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
I ask again, please don't take it personally, but besides the quantitative indicators, there are also qualitative ones.
For example, in the Spring 2009 Season, Avern-o had 4 wins, and Blacpoint had 3, but one of them was against Dubrovin Pavel.
I'd trade my 4 wins for one like that :)
And in general, if we're being serious, in the Winter 2009 Season, the average number of games for the top 20 was 29, with 18 wins.
In the Spring 2009 Season, the average number of games was 17-18, with 13 wins.
So, top players don't tend to play a large number of games, but these are mainly Tournament matches and against Strong opponents.
Although, for example, none of the strong players refuse to play against beginners. Many agreed to play with me, which means our leaders don't have "star disease," which is good. And I think it's not about boosting their rating; they're just good guys.