Skip to content

Tournament Committee - general questions.

User Avatar
#19
Auto-translated
I also received a private message from Pit, so I'll write here.

Baba Yaga is also against it :)
Against all the extra medals under avatars and titles. There's no need to create a heavy, non-game-related superstructure – the most active, the best, second place out of three, third place out of two, and so on. And if we start awarding points for all of this, in a couple of years we'll start selling them and turn from a world into a portal :)

Similarly, with catching cheaters. A permanent committee should exist, I agree. But there's no need to overdo it with the proceduralization. And a black mark – let it be. Just for clarity.

What constitutes a "newbie" is a more interesting question.
There are two ways to determine a player's skill level: (1) by their knowledge of strategy and tactics, and (2) by their game results. Since the task is for players who have played few games, (2) is unacceptable, and I propose the following criterion: "a newbie is someone who, on average (playing with medium-strength factions, on a standard map), cannot achieve Utopia by the 4th week."

Just in case, I'm writing this.
I don't participate in online tournaments. I only play in seasons. I haven't encountered any cheaters.