Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Error Details:
Share Link
Appeals Committee. Disputed situations in tournaments.
Regarding physical punishments: imagine the reaction of a player who receives a gray mark, let's say for not confirming reports. "Who's been snooping in my profile? What are these marks? Go to hell!"
That's why awarding this "award" should be well-considered and not just a simple punishment – didn't confirm, you get it. It should only be given for systematic violations of the rules of decency and disrespect towards players, organizers, and judges. And, of course, explanatory conversations about the reasons should be held first, with a warning and, as Avern says, guidance towards the right path. If the player still doesn't listen to reason, then "you get what you deserve." In any case, I'm sure this won't be a frequent occurrence, as the people here are quite polite and friendly. And for newcomers, it will be a kind of warning – "this person is not in a good state of mind." :smile48:
Пусть мой враг будет силен и страшен. Если я поборю его, то не буду чувствовать стыда.