Мафия. Learning to Live

Tomorrow, I might not be able to check in until the evening – I decided to put some eye drops in and reread everything again, to organize my thoughts. Besides, I was vaguely expecting something, and I think it happened :) So, no one should be eliminated

1. Zubr.
A very confusing murder, because there are too many clues, and I think only one of them is valuable. Undoubtedly, Zubr was killed by the Mafia. Perhaps the editor was hinting at all its members? Many of us have rags and scales. Let's talk about the newcomers... Here, Areg dropped a valuable phrase:

1) clues don't necessarily point to the killer; they can indicate who the victim was.

Zubr is participating in the newcomers' tournament (as is Revan), by the way, Hermit is a newcomer to WoW. I still think that this is just a hint that it was a Mafia meeting, nothing more. And the purpose of the meeting is Zubr's murder (the conversation is about newcomers). So, I couldn't figure out the killer here – Am really twisted the plot, but I will suggest a trio of Mafiosi: Hermit and Siv (I am led to this by their remarks, plus polar statements about me – apparently, this is a clever move), Revan is very suitable for the role of the master, i.e., the leader. Although, again, this is too obvious a hint in the word "master," which shouldn't be the case.
Having given up on finding Zubr's killer, I started looking for the maniac.

2. Arandor.
Imagine – I found him right away. At least, I am personally 90% sure. I started from the fact that there should be only one clue. It seems that Arandor was a homeless person in his past life – his head was in a trash can, so the inscription on the wall (even if it's in blood) "you're old, but you're holding up well" can only confirm this. I don't see any other meaning in the inscription. There remains a colorless liquid. A very interesting thing. The maniac is sure that he is beyond suspicion. I am racking my brains over this test tube (I am thinking about vodka, but Maloy was not chosen), then I switch to the tournament and miss Siv's brilliant thought:

Don't vampires have transparent blood, pardon?

For some reason, no one noticed, because they switched to discussing us with Meg, but just in case, Stan still comes up with a version about artists (quite inventive, +1), but no: the artist left exactly a flask with water, and the editor also calls it a colorless liquid – no, "your suspicion is too far-fetched" (as they say)...
I reread Stan's posts and find small details:
1) I find a desire to execute someone, "what difference does it make?". Indeed.
2) first, accusing Drakoshka immediately in two murders (scales and a flask at different corpses), then me and again in two murders (rag and inscription) – i.e., there is really no difference who to kill. I would attribute such behavior only to the role of a maniac, which Stan bravely endures. But these are just details. It's all about the flask.

And the last touch – what I subconsciously expected: the maniac returned to the scene of the crime! :D

P.S. I named everyone – if something happens, they killed me :D