Skip to content

"Rookie-2009"

#98
Auto-translated
SEM_56
If my memory serves me right, a similar system was already implemented and caused a lot of ambiguous situations. Let's not repeat those mistakes...
I'm looking forward to feedback and criticism!

I don't quite understand how such a simple scheme could cause any ambiguity or controversial situations...
After all, everything is crystal clear.

Let's say there are 32 people. Let's assume that 16 people advance from the groups. The first group stage, which we've been discussing, is already a knockout stage. We're only talking about giving a second chance to those 8 players who lose their first game in the first group stage (i.e., they can compete and even reach the final).