SEM_56
Auto-translated
If I remember correctly, a similar system was already implemented and caused many ambiguous situations, let's not repeat those mistakes...
Analyzing controversial situations:
1. Since there are 2 organizers (Kesh and Kostyan), as well as a judging panel in my person, we will resolve controversial situations together...
a) if a controversial situation arises during a tournament game, you can immediately write to the aforementioned guys in ICQ (those who are online, and believe me, someone will be)...
b) I ask you to remain calm and not give in to emotions, because we have a competition, not a bazaar...
2. Technical defeats or technical wins will be awarded only with the unanimous decision of all 3 judges...
a) in case of disagreement, we will involve, so to speak, an expert in such matters...
3. Also, before the start of the tournament, we can agree on some points:
1. Templates...
2. Time limit...
3. Time, when each person can play...
I am waiting for corrections and criticism!!
Analyzing controversial situations:
1. Since there are 2 organizers (Kesh and Kostyan), as well as a judging panel in my person, we will resolve controversial situations together...
a) if a controversial situation arises during a tournament game, you can immediately write to the aforementioned guys in ICQ (those who are online, and believe me, someone will be)...
b) I ask you to remain calm and not give in to emotions, because we have a competition, not a bazaar...
2. Technical defeats or technical wins will be awarded only with the unanimous decision of all 3 judges...
a) in case of disagreement, we will involve, so to speak, an expert in such matters...
3. Also, before the start of the tournament, we can agree on some points:
1. Templates...
2. Time limit...
3. Time, when each person can play...
I am waiting for corrections and criticism!!
Ушел с героев, пока пряники)