Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
and what does racial skirmishing have to do with it? Let Leo explain the main idea, and this rule is clearly debatable, and no one can really explain it. If the idea is to fight with full armies after the 4th week, then LET'S play Bandit. We'll save a lot of time there. If the idea is to correct the mistakes of newbies who will put themselves in a vulnerable position with part of their army, then that's beyond reasonable. IMO, one of the main advantages of Heroes is the ability to "outsmart" the enemy, to outplay him. And you are trying to put everyone in the same pot to the maximum, and even if someone somewhere knows something - "no-no, stop using that."
P.S. If a "good" player makes a mistake and gets hit hard, that's his mistake, why invent anything else?