Connection ErrorBad RequestThis page went staleSession ExpiredSign in requiredForbiddenNot FoundToo Many RequestsServer ErrorBad GatewayService UnavailableGateway TimeoutHTTP Version Not Supported
Session Expired
Your session has expired. Please log in to continue.
Sign in required
You need an account to do that. Sign in or create one — it only takes a minute.
This page went stale
Your security token was rejected, usually because the page sat open too long or you signed in elsewhere. Nothing was saved. Reload the page and try again.
Request Failed
We encountered an issue while processing your request.
Please check your internet connection and try again.
Hmm, did I say that a peaceful technological and industrial progress is bad? Well, yes, it has its downsides, but it also has its advantages (although not everything is positive), and in the case of military development, there are no advantages at all (I'm talking about the whole world, not just one state that is defending itself from others).
By the way, I'm currently working on a paper about disasters, accidents, and environmental pollution, and you know what? Now I know even more about "technological and industrial progress," although I already knew quite a bit about its negative impact.
As for globalization and the idea that we'll have to choose one language and one leader, that's a completely different issue. It's simply about having good relationships between countries and mutual assistance, rather than oppression and imposing one culture on everyone.
P.S. Although it will be difficult with laws and other things, because in some countries there are their own customs and traditions, which in other countries may be considered a violation of human rights, and not everyone will agree to changes.